Peptide Protocol IQ

Compare compounds

Select up to four compounds to place side by side. Comparison is descriptive: it shows what each evidence base contains, not which compound is better.

Select compounds

3 of 4 selected
Side-by-side comparison of selected compounds.
AttributeSemaglutide

GLP-1 receptor agonist (acylated 31-amino-acid analogue)

Tirzepatide

Dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist

Retatrutide

Triple GIP/GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist

Strongest claim on fileAStrongAStrongCPreliminary
Regulatory status
FDA-approved

FDA-approved products exist for type 2 diabetes and for chronic weight management, with specific labelled populations. Compounded semaglutide has been the subject of FDA communications and is not the same as an approved product.

FDA-approved

FDA-approved products exist for type 2 diabetes and chronic weight management, with defined labelled populations.

Investigational

Investigational. Not approved for any indication. Material sold outside a clinical trial is not the trial product.

Human studies catalogued2 of 2 total2 of 2 total2 of 2 total
Longest qualifying human study176 weeks176 weeks48 weeks
Most commonly studied duration68 weeks72 weeks48 weeks
Half-life
7.0 days

Approximately 7 days, supporting once-weekly administration in the trials.

5.0 days

Approximately 5 days, supporting once-weekly administration in the trials.

6.0 days

Approximately 6 days as reported in early-phase work.

Routes studied
  • Subcutaneous
  • Oral
  • Subcutaneous
  • Subcutaneous
Prohibited in sportNoNoNo
Graded claims
  • A

    Once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg was associated with substantially greater body-weight reduction than placebo over 68 weeks in adults with overweight or obesity and without diabetes.

  • B

    Whether weight reduction persists after discontinuation is a separate question from on-treatment efficacy.

  • A

    Once-weekly tirzepatide was associated with dose-dependent body-weight reduction over 72 weeks versus placebo in adults with obesity or overweight without diabetes.

  • A

    In adults with obesity and prediabetes, tirzepatide was associated with reduced progression to type 2 diabetes over 176 weeks, with weight regain reported after withdrawal.

  • C

    In a single phase 2 trial, retatrutide was associated with dose-dependent weight reduction over 48 weeks.

What is not established
  • Durability after discontinuation, and outcomes beyond the trial duration in unselected populations, remain less well characterised than the on-treatment effect.
  • Post-withdrawal regain has been reported in this drug class. Assuming persistence is not supported.
  • Comparative effectiveness against every alternative, and effects in populations excluded from the trials, are not fully established.
  • The finding is specific to a prediabetes population.
  • No phase 3 outcome data. Long-term and cardiovascular safety are unestablished. A dose-dependent heart-rate increase was reported and is unresolved.
Safety signals reported
  • Gastrointestinal events are the most common in trials (nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation)
  • Boxed warning regarding thyroid C-cell tumours in rodents; contraindicated in medullary thyroid carcinoma and MEN 2 per labelling
  • Pancreatitis reported; gallbladder events reported at increased frequency
  • Weight regain reported following discontinuation
  • Gastrointestinal events predominate, concentrated during dose escalation
  • Boxed warning regarding thyroid C-cell tumours in rodents per labelling
  • Pancreatitis and gallbladder events reported
  • Weight regain reported after treatment withdrawal in the long-term trial
  • Dose-dependent gastrointestinal events in the phase 2 trial
  • Dose-dependent heart-rate increase reported, which peaked and then declined
  • Long-term and cardiovascular safety are not established

What a comparison cannot tell you

Compounds studied for different endpoints, in different populations, by different routes, are not directly comparable even when the table places them in adjacent columns. A compound with more studies is not therefore better; it may simply have been commercially interesting for longer.