Enter as much or as little as you like. It compares what you entered against the populations that were actually studied, ranks the published protocols that fit, and assembles the ones you choose into a document you can follow: a phase map, a syringe-pull reference, a week grid, a daily log, what is worth monitoring, and what the whole thing costs at each vendor.
It is explicitly designed not to tell you what to take. Every quantity in the document arrived from a published protocol with its warrant attached, and it keeps that warrant all the way through.
iWhere this data goes
Nowhere. Everything you enter, including the protocol you build and the date you start it, stays in your own browser’s local storage. There is no account on this deployment, no server, and no analytics attached to any of it. Clearing your browser data erases it, and we never had a copy. When accounts open, this moves to your account and stays readable only by you: the row-level security policy makes profile content unreachable from the administrative interface rather than merely discouraged.
!What personalisation means here
Matching you to study populations, not generating advice. The output is of the form “three studies enrolled a population resembling what you entered, and two explicitly excluded it”. It will never say “based on your weight, use X”.
Characteristics
All optional. Left blank simply means less matching.
Compared against the longest qualifying human study, so an evidence gap is stated rather than assumed away.
Research interests
Required to generate a brief. Browse by category, or go straight to a compound if you already know the one you came for.
Medication classes
Classes only, never specific prescriptions. Used to surface documented interaction records.
Select a category or a compound to generate a brief.